Managing an Outsource Capacity Management Service

There has been a move in recent years for more aspects of IT service management to be outsourced.  This makes perfect sense for those functions that are solely concerned with the management of IT systems and resources.  However, where a function interacts with both the Business and with IT the situation is less clear.

The specific area of concern here is Capacity Management.  The goal of an IT outsourcer is to deliver the correct quality of service (as defined in the contract) for the least cost.  This approach maximises the outsourcer’s profit.  This is very closely aligned to the goals of Capacity Management.  However, Capacity Management also has the goal of ensuring that the IT provision meets the needs of the Business in a timely manner.  In a wonderful theoretical world, Demand Management would identify the needs of the business.  They would pass this to Capacity Management who would plan capacity accordingly.  Service Level Management would have set the acceptable levels of service, which Capacity management would plan, and monitor against.

Back in the real world, there are very few environments within which service levels have been defined and even less in which they are adequately monitored.  Businesses are also quite vague with their forecasts, so Demand Management is less of a science but more of an art.

This leaves the Capacity Management function with a pair of conflicting goals.  It may choose to deploy just enough infrastructure to support the Business needs today irrespective of service quality, and introduce additional capacity on a “just in time” basis thereby reducing unnecessary expenditure.  Or it may choose to over-deploy capacity to ensure that the Business always receives adequate service, but expose itself to the risk of unnecessary expenditure if it never makes use of this additional capacity.

Outsource providers would prefer the former goal, since it reduces expenditure and maximises profit margins.  In-source functions would prefer the latter goal, since it guarantees service quality for the business maximising customer satisfaction.

It is for this reason that many outsourcing agreements have ended up with TWO Capacity Management functions; one in the outsourcer, and one within the ‘vendor’ management team. 

If you find yourself working in either team, it helps to understand the motives of the other group to achieve a productive working relationship.

Posted in Blog Posts, Capacity Management | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

ITIL and me

Following on from the two previous articles, the attention has now turned to me, and my involvement with ITIL.

How did you get in to this ITIL lark?

My own specialism is Capacity Management.  I was working for the UK’s leading software and consultancy firms in this area during the 1990s.  At this time they were involved in the rewrite of the Capacity Management section of ITIL from version 1 to version 2.  When I became a self-employed consultant in 1998 I found that many organisations had either just started implementing ITIL or had at least implemented the Incident and Change processes and were looking at Capacity as one of the next processes to put in place.  I was in the right place at the right time.

Is it essential to be qualified?

The ITIL certification programme starts off with a “foundation” course and exam.  This covers the fundamental aspects of every ITIL process and explains how they interlink with each other.  Having this qualification (which only takes a couple of days) proves that you understand the basics of service management within the framework ITIL. 

Version 2 of ITIL then allowed people to become experts, or “practitioners”, of a specific ITIL process or become a “Service Manager” capable of implementing all processes. 

Version 3 has changed the qualification process so that having taken a foundation course the candidate then pursues a modular route of either “Lifecycle” or “Capability” processes that once completed follows to “expert” status and eventually “master”.

If one is responsible for implementing ITIL within an organisation then it is almost a fundamental requirement to be at the “expert” level.  However, if one is focussing on a specific process then the new v3 qualification path does not provide a clearly identifiable qualification and therefore a combination of the “foundation” qualification and many years experience are typically sufficient to prove to a client that one is suitably skilled for a role.

Posted in Blog Posts, Capacity Management | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

ITIL in the Public Sector

Following my previous article introducing ITIL, I was asked how it fitted into Public Sector organisations and the impact of budget cuts.

How does this fit in with the public sector agenda?

Given that ITIL was born from the CCTA, a UK government agency, and is owned by the OGC (Office of Government Commerce) there are strong links with the public sector.  The drive in public sector IT at the moment is to reduce costs at the same time as improving the quality of service being delivered.  This fits in perfectly with the aims of ITIL.  While there may be an element of increased costs during the set-up phases implementing ITIL, the payback from improved service management and elimination of wasteful processes and activity is quickly delivered.

Do you foresee any problems as budgets are cut over the coming year?

The main issue for ITIL implementation that cuts bring is the reduction in staffing budgets.  Although there are many products in the market that claim that they are ITIL certified or ITIL tools, ITIL itself doesn’t proscribe the use of any specific tool or technology.  The every ITIL process can be successfully implemented with nothing more complex than a spreadsheet or two.  The key to achieving this is the quality of the staff that are involved with implementing and running the ITIL functions.

So, fundamentally, if you do exactly what the books say, the job does itself?

Not at all.  That is, if anything, the fundamental error that some senior client staff and ITIL “zealots” make.  ITIL should be considered to be a guideline on the “journey” towards best practice service management, rather than the “destination” itself.  Since every organisation is different the implementation of processes to support their service management will also be different.  ITIL implementation is most definitely not a “box ticking” exercise.

Posted in Blog Posts, Capacity Management | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment