Are You Being Served?

He had his rivals ‘green’ with envy when he turned around the ailing BHS stores; he perked up Dorothy Perkins and put Topshop top of the pile. We all realised Sir Philip Green was something special. So when he says government should be as efficient as any good business we should listen.

When the retail king says government wastes millions upon millions of pounds on the procurement of goods and services such as IT, travel, print, office supplies and the management of the government's property portfolio not only should we listen, we should act.

Thankfully, it would seem the coalition government is listening and all set to act following the publication of his Efficiency Review. Now this is no off the peg report from the colourful and larger than life Sir Philip. This is a made to measure report commissioned by Prime Minister David Cameron to review government efficiency.

His results are, in his own words, ‘staggering.’ His report highlights massive variations from department to department, which, if not so serious, would sound like a script from the iconic TV series, ‘Are you Being Served?’

When he asked about government transport costs he was eventually given three answers: £2b, £500m and £768. Just in case it pops up in the next pub quiz the correct answer is £551m.

It was when Sir Philip turned to the procurement issues that I knew he has Britain’s 1.4m freelance workers on side for his honesty and insightfulness. The government procurement bill, which covers IT, travel and consultancy, was a stunning £166bn in the year 09/10.

The Efficiency Review attacks the scale of some IT contracts as being ungainly, inflexible and too large to manage. He also cites £600m contracts where principal contractors sub-contract the majority of work to another major supplier thus ensuring two profit margins. I say, ‘top marks’ to the man from Topshop.

We at PCG have been arguing for years that splitting these mega contracts into smaller segments ensures best value for money for the public sector. We felt so strongly about the subject that we included it in our manifesto and were delighted to see it incorporated into the coalition agreement.

In this case size does matter. By splitting IT projects into smaller segments public contracts could tap into the UK’s talented army of highly skilled freelance workers, rather than using the same old big suppliers. For many contractors and small businesses, bidding for government contracts is a bureaucratic nightmare. The harsh reality is that ‘prime contractors’ dominate the process and the rules on bidding end up skewed in their favour.

Following the Comprehensive Spending Review, the British social and economic landscape has changed.

Freelancers
If we are to advance economically as a nation we must listen to people like Sir Philip Green and those like him with corporate credentials as business champions. For those looking for public sector value for money they must look to the freelance sector to provide flexibility, skills and value for money. They must be able to call on a range of skills and resources when and where they need them.

Using freelancers is a tried and tested method of getting the most out of your business, as they are solely focused on freeing up potential growth with their expertise. Freelancers add some £68bn to the UK’s economy, and could add considerably more if they had greater access to government contracts.

Many freelancers already work for large suppliers to the public sector, but costs could be saved if the government engaged more freelancers directly.

Freelancers provide decades of experience that can be bought by the hour. If Philip Green is right, this is experience the civil service would clearly find useful. The UK’s 1.4 million freelancers are flexible, highly skilled workers, ready and willing to provide their expertise.

Are You Being Served?
Listen to Sir Philip Green and you might be.

Posted in Blog Posts, Freelancing | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Take That “Flood” the system… is this “Progress”?

Last Friday saw the release of tickets for the “Progress” tour by Take That. In every previous release of tickets for every previous major event, be it sporting or music, the ticket websites and phone lines have failed to cope with the Demand.

Last Friday was no different.

I tweeted (@jamescollings) at 7:40am that morning that the websites would fail to cope with the demand… and 80 minutes later every ticket sales site crashed. Am I blessed with amazing foresight? No. It was, sadly, all too predictable and demonstrates that companies really must embrace a full Capacity Management regime if they want to deliver acceptable levels of service to their customers.

The crashing of websites and phone lines has created a huge media storm. All this publicity is good for Take That… after all, it shows how in demand they are. However the ticket sellers may not come out of this so well. They now have a reputation with the public for being unable to supply a quality service. Sadly, they are all as bad as each other since none of them managed to handle the demand.

Is there anything else that could have been done?

Capacity Management in its most simple form is the provision of the right amount of capacity at the right time. Not too much, and not too little. However, if all demand is co-ordinated to occur at exactly the same moment, then a choice has to be made. Does the service provider supply enough capacity to cope with that initial rush (and then as little as half an hour later find they have 10x the capacity they need), or do they try and spread the demand over a longer period of time.

Demand Management is a discipline closely linked to Capacity Management. In many organisations the Demand Management team are responsible for liaising with the business to identify the future demands that will be placed upon the IT services. What is often missing is the flow of information in the opposite direction. What if the IT services could never reasonably cope with the business demand? This is the case for ticket sales for major events.

It is worth noting that sales for tour dates in Ireland went on sale 1 hour before the sales for UK dates. Why didn’t the Demand Management functions within the ticket sales companies work together to suggest to the Take That management team that spreading the release of tickets on a per venue basis might actually improve the ticket-buying process?

By staggering the demand over a longer period, they could have reduced the incoming load down to a level that could be supported by the systems. True, it would not have resulted in the blanket press coverage that ensued over the following 2 days. However it would also have prevented the debacle becoming the hot topic across social networking sites.

Posted in Blog Posts, Capacity Management | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

How absurd is your average?

I was listening to the radio this morning, and they announced some "fun" statistics in the way that they often do to entertain.  For example;

  • The average person spends 3 years of their life driving their car
  • The average woman spends 2 years getting ready, of which 8 months is spent putting on make-up
  • The average man spends 1.5 years cooking.

 

This got me thinking about the absurdity of using these averages for anything apart from entertainment.  For example, it would be wrong for a man to cook like mad for 1.5 years when he is 20 and then refuse to cook another meal for the rest of his life.  Equally, if you don't pass your driving test, how will you ever rack up the requisite 3 years driving your car?  These "values" are not focussed events that can occur in a single batch, but then again neither are they regular events that can be spread evenly throughout your life (if you live to be 70 years old, you can't expect to spend 1 hour each day driving... especially since you couldn't reach the pedals until you were 11!

Average values have their place... treat them without intelligence and you are playing with meaningless (and useless) information.

What has this got to do with Capacity Management?

A common "heated discussion" that is had with some IT technicians relates to the use of an average CPU utilisation.  It is claimed that averaging the CPU utilisation is a meaningless thing to do.

That all depends on when you do it, and for how long.  Averaging the CPU utilisation over a whole day is unlikely to be useful for a Capacity Manager given the amount of variation in activity that one would expect to occur during that day.  However, you have to use some sort of averaging.  Think about it.  A CPU is either doing an instruction, or it is not.  If you could monitor a CPU at the lowest possible level, then you would see it either busy (100%) or idle (0%).  You couldn't do any management at this level of granularity, so it makes sense to use an average.  But at what interval?

Some workloads are very quick, and therefore averaging the CPU utilisation at 5 or 10 second intervals might be required.  It might still give a rough-and-ready indicator of the amount of work done, but measuring at a lower level is likely to be impractical. 

Some other workloads may take many hours to complete.  Measuring CPU utilisation at 10 minute or even 1 hour intervals would be perfectly adequate in this scenario.

Fundamentally choosing the timeframe over which to measure your averages is just as much a skill of the Capacity Manager as knowing what to do with the values once you have got them.

There.  That is another 20 minutes of my 6 years of Internet use gone!

Posted in Blog Posts, Capacity Management | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments